Hapax Legomena III: Critical Mass

1971

3
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 80%
IMDb Rating 5.6/10 10 326 326

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Expert VPΝ

Plot summary

A man and a woman have been living together for six months. After disappearing for two days, the man returns and acts as if nothing has happened, refusing to say where he was.

720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
231.94 MB
1280*958
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
12 hr 25 min
Seeds ...
430.68 MB
1444*1080
English 2.0
NR
23.976 fps
12 hr 25 min
Seeds 4

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by 9 / 10

An excellent representation of senseless argumantation.

Prolonged scenes of yelling usually wear me down, but the stylistic elements Frampton utilizes here convey the meaningless of arguments between couples really well. The repetition of the dialogue matches the repetitive nature of their yelling. The audio not matching up with the picture represents how, though the couple is saying a lot of words, they're not meeting eye to eye or saying anything of substance. The various cuts to black represent how they're just blindly yelling at each other (the improvised dialogue matches this element really well). Overall, it's my favorite film I've seen from Frampton so far.
Reviewed by 2 / 10

Man and woman discuss their relationship

Reviewed by

The Obnoxiousness of Argumentation

The goal of Hollis Frampton's "Critical Mass", number three in his seven-part series "Hapax Legomena", is to once more demonstrate the filmmaker's repeated theme of disconnected sound and image. This was a theme experimented with before in "Carrots and Peas" (1969) and "(nostalgia)" of the same year, and one used by the filmmaker quite a bit in general. Here, instead of creating a tease with the audience as had the latter film, the purpose of this movie is to intentionally annoy and aggravate the viewer by stuttering the soundtrack and throwing in beeping noises to add to the effect. The situation is simple and could easily have been shortened down to six minutes from the twenty-five it runs, but likely as not the overlong run-time was part of Frampton's goal to agitate the viewer.The set-up is that of an arguing couple, one who apparently lives together but is in an argument over where the man went over a two-day period. The situation itself is one easy to identify with, but is made annoying and unpleasant through harsh picture contrasts and repeating sequences over and over again to show how truly obnoxious an argument can be. I warn you, there is a hugely excessive amount of swearing and cussing in the dialog which is replayed over and over again, and while a little bit might have been done for shock value it is used simply too much. Also, due to the run-time, the film tends to echo in your head long after it is done, and because of the original intent of the film being to aggravate this was undoubtedly part of the director's goal.Frampton also experiments a different way with sound and image by sometimes fading out the picture so that only the arguing voices are heard for long periods. Other times, he brings the couples' words out of sync with their lips to play with the viewers sense of vision connected with hearing, and at the end, stops the stuttering so everything is fluid. I would say it's one only for Frampton die-hards or those used to unpleasant avant-garde films, considering the excessive use of filthy language and the general displeasing effect of the broken-up dialog.
Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment