Fountain of Youth

2025

Action / Adventure / Fantasy / Mystery

135
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 35% · 116 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 38% · 1K ratings
IMDb Rating 5.7/10 10 55487 55.5K

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Guard VPΝ

Plot summary

A treasure-hunting mastermind assembles a team for a life-changing adventure. But to outwit and outrun threats at every turn, he'll need someone even smarter than he is: his estranged sister.

Director

Top cast

Natalie Portman as Charlotte Purdue
John Krasinski as Luke Purdue
Stanley Tucci as The Elder
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB 1080p.WEB.x265 2160p.WEB.x265
1.13 GB
1280*536
English 2.0
PG-13
Subtitles us  ar  bg  cn  cz  dk  de  gr  es  et  fi  fr  il  in  hu  id  it  ja  kr  lt  lv  ms  nl  no  pl  pt  ru  sk  sl  sv  ta  te  th  tr  uk  vi  
23.976 fps
2 hr 5 min
Seeds 100+
2.31 GB
1918*802
English 5.1
PG-13
Subtitles us  ar  bg  cn  cz  dk  de  gr  es  et  fi  fr  il  in  hu  id  it  ja  kr  lt  lv  ms  nl  no  pl  pt  ru  sk  sl  sv  ta  te  th  tr  uk  vi  
23.976 fps
2 hr 5 min
Seeds 100+
2.1 GB
1918*802
English 5.1
PG-13
Subtitles us  ar  bg  cn  cz  dk  de  gr  es  et  fi  fr  il  in  hu  id  it  ja  kr  lt  lv  ms  nl  no  pl  pt  ru  sk  sl  sv  ta  te  th  tr  uk  vi  
23.976 fps
2 hr 5 min
Seeds 100+
5.59 GB
3840*1606
English 5.1
PG-13
Subtitles us  ar  bg  cn  cz  dk  de  gr  es  et  fi  fr  il  in  hu  id  it  ja  kr  lt  lv  ms  nl  no  pl  pt  ru  sk  sl  sv  ta  te  th  tr  uk  vi  
23.976 fps
2 hr 5 min
Seeds 77

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by JPRetana

Fountain of Youth (2025) is an ill-conceived Guy

Fountain of Youth (2025) is an ill-conceived Guy Ritchie foray into Dan Brown territory by way of National Treasure and Tomb Raider that rips off the endings of both Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade and Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. In addition to being derivative, Fountain of Youth is too long, half-baked, and needlessly contrived. The more it endeavors to sound plausible, the more far-fetched it comes across. There’s no such thing as a fountain of youth. Nothing you can say is going to persuade me otherwise. The good news is that you don’t have to convince me. This is a fictional action-adventure film about, as Natalie Portman’s character puts it, “a literal liquid that expresses itself through a magical fountain that, once consumed, gives access to an eternal bliss-filled life.” As a matter of general principle, I approach this sort of material, sight unseen, in a default state of pre-suspended disbelief. It’s understood that for the next two hours, I’ll buy that the fountain of youth exists — so why is Ritchie so stubborn about selling me on it? “There’s a seed of truth cloaked within every myth, metaphor, or fable,” says the hero (similes, on the other hand, are bogus). According to this crackpot synecdoche, talking hares and tortoises regularly race each other, baseball is intercourse, and you will go blind if you don’t quit beating off. Moreover, “Herodotus wrote about [the fountain of youth]. The Mahabharata talks about it. Alexander the Great traveled the world looking for it.” While generally reliable, Herodotus was an embellisher who never let facts get in the way of a good story. The “seed of truth” theory applies to the Mahabharata only when it relates events that could have conceivably happened within the natural laws that govern the material world. And Alexander the Great never searched for the fountain of youth any more than Ponce de Leon did. Like I said, you don’t have to convince me that the fountain is real, especially when it entails going out of your way to remind me that it isn’t. You’re only succeeding in belaboring a point that ought to be moot. That’s nothing, though. Things are just about to get astoundingly dumber. We’re told that “In the 1600s, six artists made a pact to reveal the location [of the fountain of youth].” How they came by this knowledge is never explained. Caravaggio, Rubens, Wildens, Velázquez, El Greco, and Rembrandt each “hid a clue in their paintings.” This “pact” couldn’t have taken place later than 1610, the year Caravaggio died — when Velazquez and Rembrandt happened to be 11 and four years old, respectively. D’oh! Unsurprisingly, the pact involves paintings painted long after Caravaggio passed away. This plot device would be stultifyingly convoluted and the logistics alone nightmarish even if the chronology added up. The script, however, is not just careless but lazy too. The “clues” are not hidden in the paintings. They are on the back of the paintings, which of course means that what the paintings are and who painted them makes no difference. It could be any six works by any six artists, because the filmmakers couldn’t be bothered to examine the paintings for items that could be interpreted by the characters as actual clues. I’m reminded of Peter Greenaway’s Nightwatching, which is also a bunch of crock, but at least it's a great-looking crock that someone clearly gave a lot of thought to. Fountain of Youth has no regard for historical accuracy, no interest in the fine arts except as a vessel for arcana (and barely, at that), no attention to detail, and no internal logic. It’s the kind of slipshod hackjob that Bible-decoding, lunatic fringe-dwelling conspiracy nuts will lap up.
Reviewed by Manuel São Bento 7 / 10

FULL SPOILER-FREE REVIEW @ https://fandomwire.com/fountain-of-youth...

FULL SPOILER-FREE REVIEW @ https://fandomwire.com/fountain-of-youth-review/ "Fountain of Youth is a prime example of how to craft quality, crowd-pleasing entertainment without reinventing the wheel. Is it predictable? Absolutely. Formulaic? No doubt. But it’s undeniably fun, visually engaging, and driven by a charismatic cast and a director who knows exactly what he’s doing. Guy Ritchie brings his trademark energy without betraying the genre’s core identity, and James Vanderbilt delivers a solid, compelling script. It’s a shame the film didn’t get the theater release it deserved – like the ancient sites it explores, it should have been experienced in all its grandeur." Rating: B
Reviewed by Brent Western 8 / 10

I came into this movie hearing that it

I came into this movie hearing that it wasn’t all that was cracked up to be, that it was a bit lifeless and a paint by numbers movie. I can’t really dispute that. But since I was walking in with my eyes wide open, I enjoyed it for what it was. There isn’t enough exploration or exposition that gives us any idea what the characters are really about and we’re left to pee together through throwaway lines and a bunch of inferences. There are several characters that are involved that you never find out what their backstory is, why they’re doing what they’re doing, or what the end goal is. The story is one we’ve all heard before, and the neat little tricks and puzzles. It takes to find the end goal is clever and brings back memories of the da Vinci code and other similar stories. This will be one of those movies that’s on and families can enjoy for quite some time, but it won’t win any awards. Still it entertained me for the two hours it was on and at this point, that’s all I’m looking for in movies.
Read more IMDb reviews

61 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment