deebs89

Not good lol I couldn't more than 15 minutes of this it was so bad compared tot he original

Movie was alright, definitely doesn't stand up to previous Bourne movies which were all really good in my opinion. Renner is a mixed bag in this movie, and Norton as well but Rachel Weisz is really good. Story is ais a bit all over the place, but the filming quality and style of filming is well done in certainn sections I think that would be the highlight of the movie the stylized filming throughout the movie. Couple of really nice scenes Renner in the forest wioth the wolves snow coming down really nice piece would have been nice to see either an extended portion of the movie to really capture how nice that section looked maybe some more action and survival aspects but like I said the srtory is all over the place and unfortunately I feel like that was it's downfall, the only area of the movie we really concetraed devlopment is at the beginning when he meets up with someone else in the woods unfortunately the we see some pretty bad acting and ultimtately the movie is just all over the place with some pretty averwaqge acting. Overall I would give this movie a 5/10 and recommend the original Bourne movies really good if yopu ahvent watgched them all its a must watch trilogy.

Expected an action movie coming into this, never wacthed a mission impossible movie before but ended up being a nice action/thriller movie. Acting is good overall strong performances from most actors. Good story, acrtion sequences, good special effects for the age of this movie tons. If you enjoy james bond movies this is definitely for you many similaritiers to the type of movie you would expect to see from James Bond movies likle casino royale good mix of action with elements of a thriller throughout. Overall I would rate this movie 6.5/10.