YTS.GG

HD movies at the smallest file size.

Login | Register

4K

Quality:

Genre:

Year:

Rating:

Language:

Order By:

Advanced Search
2025

Javascript not supported on your browser, please enable Javascript in order to fully utilize the website

Tron

1982

Action / Adventure / Sci-Fi

Tron (1982) download

Tron

1982

Action / Adventure / Sci-Fi

Available in: 720p.BluRay 1080p.BluRay 2160p.BluRay.x265

Download Subtitles

99

61% TOMATOMETER · 164 reviews

69% AUDIENCE · 50K ratings

6.7/10 · 148K

720p.BluRay 1080p.BluRay 2160p.BluRay.x265

Download Subtitles

distopia hacker video game virtual reality dystopia simulation

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Private VPΝ

Tron (1982) download

Tron (1982) download

Tron (1982) download

Plot summary

When brilliant video game maker Flynn hacks the mainframe of his ex-employer, he is beamed inside an astonishing digital world and becomes part of the very game he is designing. In his mission through cyberspace, Flynn matches wits with a maniacal Master Control Program and teams up with Tron, a security measure created to bring balance to the digital environment.

Director

Steven Lisberger

Top cast

Charlie Picerni as Tank Commander

Jeff Bridges as Kevin Flynn / Clu

David Warner as Ed Dillinger / Sark / Master Control Program

Loyd Catlett as Conscript #1 / Video Game Cowboy

Tech specs

720p.BLU 1080p.BLU 2160p.BLU.x265

694.09 MB

1280*720

English 2.0

PG

Subtitles

23.976 fps

1 hr 36 min

Seeds 28

1.40 GB

1920*1080

English 2.0

PG

Subtitles

23.976 fps

1 hr 36 min

Seeds 100+

4.47 GB

3840*1744

English 5.1

PG

Subtitles

23.976 fps

1 hr 35 min

Seeds 53

Comments 13

Log in to join the discussion

Tris_149law 382 days ago

this movie is ahead of its time back then

primitivewar 383 days ago

Went in thinking nothing much, came out stunned. TRON: Ares (2025) feels like the movie the Grid has been waiting for. Critics might’ve buried it early, but trust me, this one deserves a second look. Watching it in IMAX 3D is an experience, not just a movie... the light, the sound, the scale, everything hits differently. I'm sure ten years ahead, yet it feels like the future arrived early, if you’ve skipped it because of some old farts' reviews, don’t. Give it a try, you’ll walk out amazed and thanked me.

kevwolf69 384 days ago

Awesome! Nice to see the request system still works, or just a coincidence? Cheers anyways!

zorg2 384 days ago

Thank you for 4K. Remember watching when it was released - I was stunned and mesmerized. Was brilliant. I guess by today's standard it pales, but .....

guiseppe 384 days ago

this looks cool, but what if its woke? im scared

bigdawglego1988 391 days ago

whats taking so long for this to get its 4K release :(

bigdawglego1988 396 days ago

4K ?

bigdawglego1988 398 days ago

4K PLEASE

Burnout 399 days ago

4K please!

SkyShazad 408 days ago

The New Updated Remastered pls out digitally on Setp 16 2025

haggis2050 469 days ago

4K a possibility please on both

Outlaw140971 864 days ago

Please Remaster 1080p 5.1

mringer0001 3364 days ago

Hell yeah!!!! Tron in 1080p this is so much love

Showing 13 of 13 threads

IMDb reviews

From IMDb

1 / 10

**Once avant-garde and innovative, this film feels archaic

Filipe Manuel Neto

**Once avant-garde and innovative, this film feels archaic and old as an arcade game, and has an absolutely miserable script.** I'm not sure what Disney was…

**Once avant-garde and innovative, this film feels archaic and old as an arcade game, and has an absolutely miserable script.** I'm not sure what Disney was thinking when they decided to make this film, but I understand the concept and the reasons that led the studio to bet on something like this. In the 1980s, the creation and gradual massification of the computer (a huge box that we see in the movie and which is now primitive compared to the machines we use) generated a “fever” around computing and led to the creation of games that, later, the World Wide Web has taken it to another level. The movie came out when personal computers started to become popular in the US, but here in my country it took about fifteen years to happen. It's extraordinary to think about this, and how quickly things have evolved. I am thirty-two years old, I belong to a generation that still lived its childhood without technologies, but I was a teenager when they started to become something more visible in our lives. So I can understand why this movie was made, but being a Disney movie, I confess I was expecting better. The film has an uninspired cast made up of third-rate actors. Among all the (almost) anonymous names, only David Warner stands out. The film also has one of the worst dramatic interpretations of Jeff Bridges' life. He was still young here, but the film's material and style didn't help him do a satisfying job. In fact, I blame the screenwriters for most of the film's problems, as they weren't able to come up with a decent story that would justify the feature film. The story that the film brings us is based on the journey of a human being inside the computer, where he will basically have to play and beat opponents. This is very little and it bores us quickly. It seems like a mere excuse for the studio to make an experiment in the field of CGI and the application of technology in cinema. Where the film really bets heavily is on the visuals, heavily stylized and inspired by two obvious elements: the integrated circuits used in engineering and the colorful and (now) somewhat forgotten neon lights. In those late 1980s, neon was something that drew attention in the urban landscape, and there was no street or square where, at dusk, dozens of neon signs did not light up. It's something that has virtually disappeared in the last decade, but that gave the city a certain life. I confess that I felt some nostalgia when feeling the aesthetic influences of all that, but I recognize that the film tried to do something far ahead of its time: the Hollywood Academy itself refused to nominate this film for an Oscar because it considered that CGI was a form of cheating. And perhaps also because they did so early, the resources used were so rudimentary (even though they were the best there was) that they gave the film an extremely heavy and dated look, which aged very poorly. The same can be said of the sound effects and even that soundtrack, so dominated by the synthesizer.

6 / 10

I saw this again yesterday - it's 40

CinemaSerf

I saw this again yesterday - it's 40 years old! I didn't see it at the time, I was one of those kids who hadn't the slightest interest in "Space Invaders" nor…

4 / 10

An acquired taste. For me, someone who has

r96sk

An acquired taste. For me, someone who has no knowledge of computer programming and the sort, it's a very slow, tedious and boring watch. 'Tron'…

More reviews on IMDb

Thanks for supporting YTS

Supporter badges recognize people who help keep YTS running.