YTS.GG

HD movies at the smallest file size.

Quality:

Genre:

Year:

Rating:

Language:

Order By:

Advanced Search
2025

Javascript not supported on your browser, please enable Javascript in order to fully utilize the website

To Dye For: The Documentary

2024

Action / Documentary

To Dye For: The Documentary

2024

Action / Documentary

Available in: 720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
WEB: same quality as BluRay

6.0/10 · 295

720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
WEB: same quality as BluRay

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (adhd) parenting government regulation nutrition behavioral disorders pseudo science

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Guard VPΝ

Plot summary

After discovering their child's life-altering sensitivity to synthetic dyes, parents and first-time filmmakers set out to uncover the impacts of these additives. They journey to meet with the world's leading synthetic dye experts, conducting in-person interviews with scientists, researchers, and impacted families. This exploration reveals a series of shocking stories and surprising discoveries.

Director

Brandon Cawood

Top cast

Tech specs

720p.WEB 1080p.WEB

775.57 MB

1280*534

English 2.0

23.976 fps

1 hr 24 min

Seeds 5

1.41 GB

1920*800

English 2.0

23.976 fps

1 hr 24 min

Seeds 11

Comments 1

NullUnit 648 days ago

... just not shocking or surprising enough to make anyone else want to watch...

Showing 1 of 1 threads

IMDb reviews

From IMDb

3 / 10

Average simple doc, all 50 reviews are 10stars

Xavier_Stone

This doc does a decent job of getting the info out there that there are artificial dyes that we should be aware of. It even starts naming them in the first few…

4 / 10

Fine doc, needed an editor

LoafOfMidwestBread

I work in video journalism and this film reminds me of a lot of projects by new filmmakers who feel passionately on a topic - emotional stories, interviews on…

I work in video journalism and this film reminds me of a lot of projects by new filmmakers who feel passionately on a topic - emotional stories, interviews on one side of an argument, the making of the film itself used as a narrative device (it was your son that was interesting, not your being new to the craft), a lack of new or groundbreaking information / footage, and longer than necessary. Which is fine; most filmmakers - newcomers and veterans alike - will fall into these traps. It's so easy to do. What most people need to avoid these is an editor, which I couldn't feel in this project (and by "editor" I don't necessarily mean the person who holds the mouse and controls the editing software - I mean someone who will ruthlessly force the filmmakers to cut the fat, to get outside their comfort zones, to break new ground or to find new information, and ask the filmmakers to examine their own biases (counter arguments are actually *good* for the credibility of a project, but it can be hard for an advocate to realize this)).The things I would've liked to have seen in this film: (1) discussion of the crackpot pseudoscience fringe who have attached themselves to this issue - has that hurt the cause? Give us a peek of the reality inside the movement. (2) An examination / explanation of how it can be that the FDA can ban something for external use but allow it for internal use. (3) Interviews with food industry folks: someone defending food dyes ("Americans want crazy-looking crap - what are we supposed to do??") and/or someone who worked in the food industry at the time these dyes were taking hold and can offer us a peek behind the curtain. It would be especially cool to hear from someone who developed these dyes and tried to make them safe for kids....but failed. And most of all, (4) someone at FDA - either *currently* as a whistleblower, or *formerly* as a "I can't believe I saw this go down"-type voice - who can provide either a smoking gun or provide info that shows how this is a profit-vs-people issue. I suppose the FDA interview could also be a humorous device when the person can't tell us why such toxic crap is allowed in our food. Oh and (5) less reliance on personal, tragic narratives. Some of this is absolutely needed, but such a huge issue that's been at-play for decades now should also have produced macro-sized data and big health trends that were missing from the film. Oh and (6), yeah, it doesn't look great that there are a bunch of 10-star reviews from first-time reviewers and the "rate this" score is around 6.It also would've been really cool to see your wife confront a food executive; moms with kids who've been harmed have the moral high ground 100% of the time.But kudos for getting a passion project into the form of a feature film. I hope it produces good things for your son. Much of the lighting and cinematography were really beautiful, and you found some very compelling personal stories.

6 / 10

Nothing new you didnt know

mariabrankovic

At this point I really dont understand parents who dont know how artifical food, drink, plastic, pesticides are changing not only kids but sterilise adults.…

More reviews on IMDb

Thanks for supporting YTS

Supporter badges recognize people who help keep YTS running.