★ 10 / 10
Amazingly smart film that most if not all
John C
Amazingly smart film that most if not all people would question...like why the hell did he do that? Why did he pick him up? Why isn't the dad doing anything…
Amazingly smart film that most if not all people would question...like why the hell did he do that? Why did he pick him up? Why isn't the dad doing anything about this? Why is the dad so stupid? That dad is an idiot! I would never let my kid go wandering alone with a guy like that! Why is the dad a moron through out the whole movie? It's a film that gets under your skin all the way until the bitter end. It's creepy, homoerotic and very strange. I'll tell you that much.
Read full review
★ 7 / 10
Trusting man allows young hitch hiker who makes
R T
Trusting man allows young hitch hiker who makes friends with his 10-year old son to tag along for family RV vacation against wife's wishes. One must question…
Trusting man allows young hitch hiker who makes friends with his 10-year old son to tag along for family RV vacation against wife's wishes. One must question the wisdom of parents who allow their 10-year old to have an overnight sleep with a man they pick up hitchhiking. Hitcher turns out to be doing a psychological experiment on the couple. Interesting thriller.
Read full review
★ 6 / 10
A Mixed Bag
ChristopherLewisWheeler
Good evening, everyone! I'm Mr. C Reviewer, and tonight we'll be diving into the film Mind Games. I had the opportunity to watch the movie on Fawesome. This…
Good evening, everyone! I'm Mr. C Reviewer, and tonight we'll be diving into the film Mind Games. I had the opportunity to watch the movie on Fawesome. This movie originally premiered on March 3, 1989, and has a runtime of 1 hour and 33 minutes. It is rated for viewers aged 18 and older. Notably, parts of the film were filmed in California, USA. The projected revenue was approximately $85,085. As someone on the autism spectrum, I found subtitles to be incredibly helpful, greatly enhancing my ability to follow the dialogue throughout the film. The film was directed by Bob Yari and written by Kenneth Dorward.Summary: On a heartfelt quest to mend their faltering marriage, Dana and Rita Lund embark on a road trip through the breathtaking landscapes of California's wilderness with their young son, Kevin. As they seek to reignite the spark in their relationship, their journey takes an unsettling turn when they cross paths with Eric Garrison-a charismatic yet menacing hitchhiker harboring ulterior motives.Review: -I appreciated how the film opens by introducing us to the Lund family and showcasing their interactions prior to the RV trip. Personally, I would have preferred if the movie had commenced a week before their journey rather than on the day itself, as this would have allowed for a deeper understanding of their family dynamics before embarking on their adventure. I appreciated how the film delivers a richly layered examination of complex family dynamics, trust, psychological manipulation, gender roles, and parenting responsibilities. The film's relaxed tone leads to an absence of tension and conflict, which are critical elements in a psychological thriller. It begins with a gradual build-up; however, once the hitchhiker Eric enters their lives, the pacing becomes erratic. While some scenes are marked by melodrama and exaggerated exchanges, others drag on without providing meaningful development or suspense. I appreciated the casting choices for the film; although there were instances of commendable acting, several performances occasionally felt stiff or overly dramatic. Notably, Matt delivered a nuanced performance that distinguished him among the adult actors. The music occasionally seemed misaligned with the scenes, particularly those designed to evoke tension and suspense. While the audio mix was satisfactory, it did not reach a level of excellence. There were moments when ambient sounds and effects fell short of fully enriching the atmosphere.-I appreciated that when characters read notes during scenes, it was not their own voices that conveyed the text, but rather the voice of the individual who authored the message. I admired the cinematography, which employed a rich variety of shot types to significantly enhance the narrative. The gentle lighting established a nuanced atmosphere that I found appealing; however, while all the essential elements in each frame were distinctly visible, some parts could have benefited from additional brightness. Personally, I often adjust my screen's brightness for a better viewing experience, which proved particularly helpful during this film. I believe I would have appreciated the film more if some scenes had been slightly shorter. I liked that the film implied animal deaths without showing the act or its aftermath; however, I still found it to be a challenging watch.-While I appreciated certain aspects of the ending, I found it to be somewhat underwhelming. The revelation of Eric's motivations felt delayed and somewhat awkwardly executed. I anticipated the conclusion, which seemed unrealistic and did not adequately explore the deeper issues present in Dana and Rita's relationship.I rate each film I watch out of 10 and for this one, I give it a 5.5 Remember this was what I thought about the movie personally and I suggest that you give it a go for yourself.
Read full review
86%
AUDIENCE
5.3/10
357
