lo cierto es que los responsables del exterminio de esta raza son los que se ocultan tras las 13 familia$ que modifican el adn con nanotecnologia por todos los medios

where's my flying car ! we were promised a flying car damn it !

RespectMyAuthoritay I have carefully read your comments. Why are you still here, instead of helping the world solve the terrible climate disaster?

I can't believe we're still arguing about this!!

RespectMyAuthoritay : In the battle to have fewer people in this world: You go first.

The guy on the cover has those crazy "lefty eyes"

1 @GenericName What scientists are you listening to that have no proof?

maybe we should just start eating people........

@shawnslaught If you don't count the 279.6 million vehicles in the US alone or the many wild fires started by humans, or the my fact that those factories you talk about would reduce their emissions by half if there was half the population. There are over 330 million people in the US, during the winter most of them burn wood fires or use natural gas to heat their homes and in the summer most of them use air conditioning to cool their homes. While air conditioners use electricity and can be run off solar or wind those solar panel and wind turbines are manufactured in a factory that produces green house gasses producing them then transporting them to where they need to be. If there was less people then there would be less solar panels and less wind turbines needed. More people, more plastics, more trash, more food needed, more products bought, more beef consumed thus more cows producing methane. I don't care how you pitch it the fact is that the more people there are the more greenhouse gasses are produced. The more resources used up, the more natural land is taken for housing, the more trees cut down to make those structures, the more trucks on the road hauling the wood and other products to make those houses. So please you people on the left, learn to see reality.

@RespectMyAuthoritay The problem isn't "too many people". Most of the greenhouse gasses and pollution are caused by just a handful of corporations. The problem isn't overpopulation, it's capitalism.

Less people equals less greenhouse gas production. In 1980 there were about 130 million less people in the US. Less houses, less businesses, less cars, less trash, less food being grown which means less fertilizers used and less of it making its way into water supplies and into oceans that create dead zones. FACT, if there was 130 million less people in the US the US greenhouse emissions would drop by 1/3 what it is today. Stop immigration as poor people have less money to buy the products they do when they immigrate to the US. Those products create greenhouse gasses, use resources and require transportation for distribution which creates greenhouse gasses. There are massive numbers of big rigs on the freeways and roads delivering stuff, all of them polluting. There are massive numbers of container ships criss-crossing the oceans spewing greenhouse gasses. The skies are filled with aircraft all polluting the atmosphere. Even if climate change isn't caused by humans, life would be a lot nicer with less pollution, less people, less traffic, more open spaces. Does anyone like the traffic? Does anyone like the pollution in the air, the people with asthma? The noise pollution? The trash everywhere? I cant go anywhere in the woods without finding trash these days. Less people, less plastic ending up in the oceans. It isn't just about stopping fossil fuel usage, it is more about less people. People are consumers, people in wealthy countries consume more than those in poor countries. People in and that come from poor countries have more children than people from wealthier countries. These are all facts. Facts that the left wont acknowledge. It is typical of the left, to select one aspect while ignoring the big picture.

Predictive programming. Like Die hard with a vengence telling a story about gold theft from under the buildings in NY then 6 years later 9/11 happened and gold and silver was taken from under WTC buildings.

So is this the next year that they are going to be wrong about. Again. A study of the history of environmentalism shows that the ONLY they are consistent on is being wrong. Especially with projections.

2050 you say? Not going to be a problem. Two years ago the omniscient bartender said the world will end in twelve years, so we'll all be dead and gone long before this new Endgame Apocalypse.

axiomwatson < Doesn't know what "alt-right" is. Thinks anyone right of the far left is "alt-right" LOL

Remeber folks : New York would be under water by 2010......

Thank you FREEMAN! ***kowtowing*** You made my titanium dog eyes blinded! again and again and again and AGAIN! (lovin the action on the comment section btw LMAO)

the comments are more exciting than the movie.... (pop corn time)

Newsflash! I have just heard of an epic agreement between leaders of the left and far-right. Apparently, in the interests of harmony, the dumbest 20% of left group members will become members of the alt-right. Psychologists have estimated that this move alone will increase the average IQ of both groups by at least 10%.

Lots of American alt-right views here. They are themselves a convincing argument that the gene pool needs a little chlorine now and then...........