Elizabeth Is Missing

2019

Action / Drama / Mystery

6
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 93% · 27 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 82%
IMDb Rating 7.4/10 10 3209 3.2K

dementia alzheimer's disease flashback caregiver missing person post it

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Guard VPΝ

Plot summary

Maud's best friend Elizabeth has disappeared, but as she tries to solve the mystery, dementia threatens to erase all the clues, giving the search a poignant urgency.

Director

Aisling Walsh Photo
Aisling Walsh

Top cast

Sophie Rundle Photo
Sophie Rundle as Sukey
Helen Behan Photo
Helen Behan as Helen
Michelle Duncan Photo
Michelle Duncan as Ma
Nell Williams Photo
Nell Williams as Katy
720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
806.99 MB
1280*640
English 2.0
TV-14
Subtitles us  
25 fps
1 hr 27 min
Seeds ...
1.62 GB
1920*960
English 5.1
TV-14
Subtitles us  
25 fps
1 hr 27 min
Seeds 1

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by tony h 10 / 10

Everybody ought to watch and be sure to

Everybody ought to watch and be sure to understand what's going-on in this film. It's a picture about the bigger picture, really; Superbly done, and eminently watchable!
Reviewed by Barb S 10 / 10

I chose to watch "Elizabeth is Missing" because

I chose to watch "Elizabeth is Missing" because it's a mystery & Glenda Jackson is the lead. I was wary about the backdrop of Alzheimer's Disease; I was not in the mood for tragedy. It IS a mystery & Ms. Jackson is brilliant playing her character. There's so much dimension to her and she keeps moving the plot along. It's a rich movie, doesn't require any tears (though I did sigh a few times), and I did manage to fold a basket of laundry while watching. I highly recommend it.
Reviewed by harris r 6 / 10

Felt like four short random film-school projects on

Felt like four short random film-school projects on the same subject burned onto one DVD. One would expect that a four part anthology would have something more in common than just the theme. This film was not the case. Although all four were very well shot - and I'm assuming on a low budget, they were still flawed. The second one was the most interesting and captivating, with some nice unexpected twists, and well acted. The third one touched on some real-life issues, and performances were the best of all four, but it was slow, depressing and predictable. The last one was just a smorgasbord of self-experimentation - albeit with some decent special effects, sub-par acting, with the predictable ending being the only fun part. The first one was just a pointless story with many plot holes, and without any real substance or merit to its story. Probably the worst performances of the four. Thankfully all four were nice and short and filled up the 94 min total runtime efficiently.
Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment