Candidate for best ever train movie.
jimm-8
The BFI should be congratulated for restoring this previously unavailable little masterpiece, arguably the best train documentary ever made. The story of Blue…
The BFI should be congratulated for restoring this previously unavailable little masterpiece, arguably the best train documentary ever made. The story of Blue Pullman's "maiden voyage" from Manchester to London is presented in vivid colour with stylish editing. After a short preamble showing the boffins at work on final trials and checks, the train gets under way with many beautifully photographed sequences shot from the air and from the driver's cab.The master stroke, however, is the decision to dispense with the usual commentary, thus enabling the viewer to hear every note of Clifton Parker's joyous score, (why aren't CD producers fighting amongst themselves to release it?).Perhaps the only fault with the film is that Blue Pullman, with its luxury fittings and heavenly dining car, comes over as looking a bit too beautiful -- nobody remembers dingy old British Railways looking anything like this! That apart, this is a highly enjoyable way to spend 26 minutes, so much so that one is quite sad when the journey comes to an end.
Read full review
Showing but not Telling
JamesHitchcock
British Transport Films was an organisation set up in 1949 to make documentary films on the general subject of British transport, in the same way as the GPO…
British Transport Films was an organisation set up in 1949 to make documentary films on the general subject of British transport, in the same way as the GPO Film Unit had been set up in the 1930s to make films about the work of the Post Office. "Blue Pullman" is one of their productions and takes British Rail's new Blue Pullman service. The Blue Pullmans were luxury inter-city express trains pulled by diesel locomotives painted a distinctive shade of blue.British documentaries were normally made with the express purpose of educating the public about some topic of general interest, or at least about some topic which the film-makers perceived as being of general interest, and in order to do so normally presented the viewers with a didactic voice-over by an unseen narrator, sometimes backed up by "talking head" interviews. "Blue Pullman", however, seems to have been made as a form of advertisement for the new service rather than an educational documentary, so director James Ritchie dispenses with commentary altogether; the only dialogue we hear consists of conversations between the people we see. This was a style of documentary which became known as "fly-on-the-wall", showing but not telling. John Schlesinger was to use a similar style in his BTF documentary "Terminus" made the following year.The film depicts the first journey of a Blue Pullman from London to Manchester. The first half of the film features members of BR's staff putting the finishing touches to the engine and carriages and checking that everything is running smoothly; the second half covers the journey itself, with special emphasis on the luxurious accommodation and the sumptuous meals served. The film also stresses punctuality, something for which BR was not always famous. We learn, for example, that the train is due to pass through Kettering station not just at 09:55 but at 09:55 1/2.There is an interesting comparison between this film and "Elizabethan Express", another BTF film made for British Rail six years earlier and also publicising a new luxury express service, the "Elizabethan Express" from London to Edinburgh. Both films depict train journey, both feature striking photography showing the train travelling through beautiful countryside and both even feature a musical score written by the same composer, Clifton Parker. James Ritchie, the director of "Blue Pullman", had worked as a cameraman on the earlier film.And yet, despite the fact that the two films were made just six years apart, "Blue Pullman" seems for more modern than "Elizabethan Express". Part of the reason is that the train in the earlier film is pulled by a steam train, not a diesel. In 1954 people thought that Britain's railways would continue to be powered by steam for the foreseeable future; BR were introducing new steam locomotives designed to last until the end of the century. By 1960 BR had changed their minds and decided that the future lay with diesel and electric traction; their new locomotives were becoming obsolete almost as soon as they were built.Another part of the reason is the way that the two documentaries were made. Whereas "Blue Pullman" is in colour, "Elizabethan Express" is in black-and-white. Moreover, it is not a "fly-on-the-wall" documentary but includes commentary. The makers of that film were obviously trying to imitate the famous "Night Mail" from the thirties, another film about a train journey from London to Scotland, by having a commentary in verse. Unfortunately the writer, Paul le Saux, was no W H Auden, and his verse just comes out as doggerel. Parker's music for the later film sounds more dynamic and evocative of speed than does his lush romantic score for "Elizabethan Express". Two films on a similar subject, two very different styles of filmmaking.
Read full review
7.8/10
86
•••
is there a possibility of also uploading this is york and between the tides from the british transport film collection? or all of them, haha :)