Assassin 33 A.D.
2020
Action / Sci-Fi
Assassin 33 A.D.
2020
Action / Sci-Fi
Plot summary
When a billionaire gives a group of young scientists unlimited resources to study the science of matter transfer, the scientists unlock the secrets of time travel. But they soon find out that the project is backed by a militant extremist group, and the billionaire plans to go back in time and prove that Jesus never rose from the dead.
Director
Top cast
Tech specs
720p.WEB 1080p.WEBComments 27
anyone willing to watch this crap even after reading the plot should be admitted to hospital for mental ilness
As Muslim I assure you that If any Muslim says He don't believe in Jesus( Allah's peace be upon him) he's not a Muslim. If any Muslim says that He's gonna fight Jesus(pbuh) or possibly kill him he's totally totally Against ISLAM and The Almighty Allah. If a human kill another human it’s like he or she killed all mankind. Killing is the worst crime one can do.
Really disgusting to use Muslims as a target as assassins against the greatest Icon in Islam. Muslim believe in Jesus (Peace be upon Him) and it is a must. So I am totally against this Movie. 0 ? from me
Actually wanted to watch this but decided to check out the comments 1st, I am a Muslim and quite disturbed to see that if you a Muslim you shouldn't watch it as I believe in Jesus just as much as any Christian... Probably even more but we won't go into that... Just poor and a disgrace to see comments like that
ok i kinda had to watch it through after everybody said that they hate it , i did mention earlier i had it speed forward just to get the idea but now that i have a whole idea then basically if you are a muslim don't watch this , if you are a christian you'll love it , if you are an atheist it'll make you curse like an idiot , which is exactly what's going on here :D
bringing the ratings debate from imdb to here is kinda funny , partly because this is a pirated contents site , christians shouldn't be here in first place :D
ChiplleWipps, you may need to rethink your opinion. Considering that Jesus’ ministry was largely confined to a relatively unimportant area in a small corner of the Roman Empire, a surprising amount of information about Jesus can be drawn from secular historical sources. Some of the more important historical evidences of Jesus include the following: The first-century Roman Tacitus, who is considered one of the more accurate historians of the ancient world, mentioned superstitious “Christians” (from Christus, which is Latin for Christ), who suffered under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius. Suetonius, chief secretary to Emperor Hadrian, wrote that there was a man named Chrestus (or Christ) who lived during the first century (Annals 15.44). Flavius Josephus is the most famous Jewish historian. In his Antiquities he refers to James, “the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ.” There is a controversial verse (18:3) that says, “Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man. For he was one who wrought surprising feats....He was [the] Christ...he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him.” One version reads, “At this time there was a wise man named Jesus. His conduct was good and [he] was known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and the other nations became his disciples. Pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die. But those who became his disciples did not abandon his discipleship. They reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion, and that he was alive; accordingly he was perhaps the Messiah, concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders.” Julius Africanus quotes the historian Thallus in a discussion of the darkness that followed the crucifixion of Christ (Extant Writings, 18). Pliny the Younger, in Letters 10:96, recorded early Christian worship practices including the fact that Christians worshiped Jesus as God and were very ethical, and he includes a reference to the love feast and Lord’s Supper. The Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 43a) confirms Jesus’ crucifixion on the eve of Passover and the accusations against Christ of practicing sorcery and encouraging Jewish apostasy.
Ok i had to speed forward most of the movie because of low budget so nothing visually impressive to see and the acting is average but to note , the script seems good , but is understandable that hollywood being jewish would hate spending on projects that promotes christianity and then this might explain why there is a war on imdb trying to slander it between muslims , atheists and christians . but then bottom line , the script isn't so bad so at least its worth a 5 over 10 .
Be the first to leave a comment.
Showing 20 of 27 threads








•••
Dont watch