A Kid in King Arthur's Court

1995

Adventure / Comedy / Family / Fantasy / Romance

14
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 5% · 22 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 27% · 50K ratings
IMDb Rating 4.8/10 10 7464 7.5K

time travel earthquake camelot king arthur medieval 6th century

Please enable your VPΝ when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPΝ, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Surf VPΝ

Plot summary

A Southern California kid named Calvin Fuller is magically transported to the medieval kingdom of Camelot through a crack in the ground caused by an earthquake. Once there, he learns he was summoned by the wizard Merlin, who needs Calvin to save Camelot. Using dazzling modern inventions, can Calvin help King Arthur retain his crown and thwart the evil Lord Belasco?

Director

Michael Gottlieb Photo
Michael Gottlieb

Top cast

Kate Winslet Photo
Kate Winslet as Princess Sarah
Daniel Craig Photo
Daniel Craig as Master Kane
Paloma Baeza Photo
Paloma Baeza as Princess Katey
Art Malik Photo
Art Malik as Lord Belasco
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU 720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
827.85 MB
1280*690
English 2.0
PG
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 4
1.5 GB
1920*1036
English 2.0
PG
Subtitles us  
23.976 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 12
827.61 MB
1280*694
English 2.0
PG
Subtitles us  
24 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 2
1.5 GB
1920*1040
English 2.0
PG
Subtitles us  
24 fps
1 hr 30 min
Seeds 5

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by r96sk 4 / 10

Dreadful film. Everything about 'A Kid in King

Dreadful film. Everything about 'A Kid in King Arthur’s Court' is just so poor, the whole feel of the film is extremely low-budget and limp. The writing is substandard, while the dialogue is actually terrible; it forces the 'present day vs. old days' theme way too much, it needed more to it. The casting can make such a difference in how your film comes out, you can have a load of crap but if you get a strong cast you can still produce something good. This simply doesn't do that, though there is an interesting caveat - as both Kate Winslet and Daniel Craig incredibly appear, in just their third and second films respectively - huge credit to the Hubbards & Co., the UK casting directors. The premise is just so dumb and uninteresting. Disney already adapted the Mark Twain novel in 1979 with 'Unidentified Flying Oddball', which I didn't love, so it's bizarre they chose to go back to it. As noted earlier, they try to make it noteworthy by colliding the two differing eras but it just comes across as lazy. There's one, very minor, part I did like and that was King Arthur's little story with the Excalibur sword. It's nothing amazing, but I could appreciate what they were trying to do with that at the very least. Entirely forgettable, one of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995; from the ones I've seen to date, which is the majority, it's in my bottom six in fact.
Reviewed by r96sk 4 / 10

One of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995

Dreadful film.Everything about 'A Kid in King Arthur's Court' is just so poor, the whole feel of the film is extremely low-budget and limp. The writing is substandard, while the dialogue is actually terrible; it forces the 'present day vs. old days' theme way too much, it needed more to it.The casting can make such a difference in how your film comes out, you can have a load of crap but if you get a strong cast you can still produce something good. This simply doesn't do that, though there is an interesting caveat - as both Kate Winslet and Daniel Craig incredibly appear, in just their third and second films respectively - huge credit to the Hubbards & Co., the UK casting directors.The premise is just so dumb and uninteresting. Disney already adapted the Mark Twain novel in 1979 with 'Unidentified Flying Oddball', which I didn't love, so it's bizarre they chose to go back to it. As noted earlier, they try to make it noteworthy by colliding the two differing eras but it just comes across as lazy.There's one, very minor, part I did like and that was King Arthur's little story with the Excalibur sword. It's nothing amazing, but I could appreciate what they were trying to do with that at the very least.Entirely forgettable, one of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995; from the ones I've seen to date, which is the majority, it's in my bottom six in fact.
Reviewed by

Read more IMDb reviews

3 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment